#include #include #include #include #include int __sata_buffer_io(struct hba_port* port, uint64_t lba, void* buffer, uint32_t size, int write) { assert_msg(((uintptr_t)buffer & 0x3) == 0, "HBA: Bad buffer alignment"); struct hba_cmdh* header; struct hba_cmdt* table; int slot = hba_prepare_cmd(port, &table, &header, buffer, size); int bitmask = 1 << slot; // 确保端口是空闲的 wait_until(!(port->regs[HBA_RPxTFD] & (HBA_PxTFD_BSY | HBA_PxTFD_DRQ))); port->regs[HBA_RPxIS] = 0; header->options |= HBA_CMDH_WRITE * (write == 1); uint16_t count = ICEIL(size, port->device->block_size); struct sata_reg_fis* fis = table->command_fis; if ((port->device->flags & HBA_DEV_FEXTLBA)) { // 如果该设备支持48位LBA寻址 sata_create_fis( fis, write ? ATA_WRITE_DMA_EXT : ATA_READ_DMA_EXT, lba, count); } else { sata_create_fis(fis, write ? ATA_WRITE_DMA : ATA_READ_DMA, lba, count); } /* 确保我们使用的是LBA寻址模式 注意:在ACS-3中(甚至在ACS-4),只有在(READ/WRITE)_DMA_EXT指令中明确注明了需要将这一位置位 而并没有在(READ/WRITE)_DMA注明。 但是这在ACS-2中是有的!于是这也就导致了先前的测试中,LBA=0根本无法访问,因为此时 的访问模式是在CHS下,也就是说LBA=0 => Sector=0,是非法的。 所以,我猜测,这要么是QEMU/VirtualBox根据ACS-2来编写的AHCI模拟, 要么是标准出错了(毕竟是working draft) */ fis->dev = (1 << 6); int retries = 0; while (retries < MAX_RETRY) { port->regs[HBA_RPxCI] = bitmask; wait_until(!(port->regs[HBA_RPxCI] & bitmask)); if ((port->regs[HBA_RPxTFD] & HBA_PxTFD_ERR)) { // 有错误 sata_read_error(port); retries++; } else { vfree_dma(table); return 1; } } fail: vfree_dma(table); return 0; } int sata_read_buffer(struct hba_port* port, uint64_t lba, void* buffer, uint32_t size) { return __sata_buffer_io(port, lba, buffer, size, 0); } int sata_write_buffer(struct hba_port* port, uint64_t lba, void* buffer, uint32_t size) { return __sata_buffer_io(port, lba, buffer, size, 1); } void sata_read_error(struct hba_port* port) { uint32_t tfd = port->regs[HBA_RPxTFD]; port->device->last_error = (tfd >> 8) & 0xff; port->device->last_status = tfd & 0xff; }