+#include <arch/abi.h>
#include <arch/x86/interrupts.h>
-#include <arch/x86/tss.h>
#include <hal/apic.h>
#include <hal/cpu.h>
struct exec_param* execp =
(void*)dummy_stack + DUMMY_STACK_SIZE - sizeof(struct exec_param);
+ isr_param* isrp = (void*)execp - sizeof(isr_param);
+
*execp = (struct exec_param){
.cs = KCODE_SEG,
.eflags = cpu_reflags() | 0x0200,
.ss = KDATA_SEG,
};
+ *isrp = (isr_param){ .registers = { .ds = KDATA_SEG,
+ .es = KDATA_SEG,
+ .fs = KDATA_SEG,
+ .gs = KDATA_SEG },
+ .execp = execp };
+
// memset to 0
dummy_proc = (struct proc_info){};
- dummy_proc.intr_ctx = (isr_param){ .registers = { .ds = KDATA_SEG,
- .es = KDATA_SEG,
- .fs = KDATA_SEG,
- .gs = KDATA_SEG },
- .execp = execp };
+ dummy_proc.intr_ctx = isrp;
dummy_proc.page_table = cpu_rcr3();
dummy_proc.state = PS_READY;
由于这中间没有进行地址空间的交换,所以第二次跳转使用的是同一个内核栈,而之前默认tss.esp0的值是永远指向最顶部
这样一来就有可能会覆盖更早的上下文信息(比如嵌套的信号捕获函数)
*/
- tss_update_esp(proc->intr_ctx.esp);
apic_done_servicing();
llist_append(&root_proc->sleep.sleepers, &__current->sleep.sleepers);
}
- __current->intr_ctx.registers.eax = seconds;
+ store_retval(seconds);
block_current();
schedule();