#include <lunaix/spike.h>
int
-__sata_buffer_io(struct hba_port* port,
+__sata_buffer_io(struct hba_device* dev,
uint64_t lba,
void* buffer,
uint32_t size,
{
assert_msg(((uintptr_t)buffer & 0x3) == 0, "HBA: Bad buffer alignment");
+ struct hba_port* port = dev->port;
struct hba_cmdh* header;
struct hba_cmdt* table;
- int slot = hba_alloc_slot(port, &table, &header, 0);
+ int slot = hba_prepare_cmd(port, &table, &header, buffer, size);
int bitmask = 1 << slot;
// 确保端口是空闲的
port->regs[HBA_RPxIS] = 0;
- table->entries[0] = (struct hba_prdte){ .byte_count = size - 1,
- .data_base = vmm_v2p(buffer) };
- header->prdt_len = 1;
header->options |= HBA_CMDH_WRITE * (write == 1);
uint16_t count = ICEIL(size, port->device->block_size);
// 如果该设备支持48位LBA寻址
sata_create_fis(
fis, write ? ATA_WRITE_DMA_EXT : ATA_READ_DMA_EXT, lba, count);
- fis->dev = (1 << 6) * (!write);
} else {
sata_create_fis(fis, write ? ATA_WRITE_DMA : ATA_READ_DMA, lba, count);
}
+ /*
+ 确保我们使用的是LBA寻址模式
+ 注意:在ACS-3中(甚至在ACS-4),只有在(READ/WRITE)_DMA_EXT指令中明确注明了需要将这一位置位
+ 而并没有在(READ/WRITE)_DMA注明。
+ 但是这在ACS-2中是有的!于是这也就导致了先前的测试中,LBA=0根本无法访问,因为此时
+ 的访问模式是在CHS下,也就是说LBA=0 => Sector=0,是非法的。
+ 所以,我猜测,这要么是QEMU/VirtualBox根据ACS-2来编写的AHCI模拟,
+ 要么是标准出错了(毕竟是working draft)
+ */
+ fis->dev = (1 << 6);
int retries = 0;
}
int
-sata_read_buffer(struct hba_port* port,
+sata_read_buffer(struct hba_device* dev,
uint64_t lba,
void* buffer,
uint32_t size)
{
- return __sata_buffer_io(port, lba, buffer, size, 0);
+ return __sata_buffer_io(dev, lba, buffer, size, 0);
}
int
-sata_write_buffer(struct hba_port* port,
+sata_write_buffer(struct hba_device* dev,
uint64_t lba,
void* buffer,
uint32_t size)
{
- return __sata_buffer_io(port, lba, buffer, size, 1);
+ return __sata_buffer_io(dev, lba, buffer, size, 1);
}
void
{
uint32_t tfd = port->regs[HBA_RPxTFD];
port->device->last_error = (tfd >> 8) & 0xff;
+ port->device->last_status = tfd & 0xff;
}
\ No newline at end of file